Governance Instrument

What is unreliability costing your operation each year?

Most operations carry a recurring, recoverable reliability cost that never appears as a single line on the P&L. This instrument provides an indicative estimate of that exposure — conservatively modelled, with the methodology shown in full. It is a starting point for a conversation, not a substitute for analysis.

Enter your figures — your exposure updates as you type
Your Operation
%
$
$
Indicative Result
$7.2M$16.1M
Indicative Annual Recoverable Reliability Exposure
A modelled range, not a forecast. The breakdown below shows where the exposure originates.
Production-loss exposure$4.7M – $11.1M
Reactive maintenance premium$2.0M – $3.8M
Capital / inventory inefficiency$0.5M – $1.3M
How This Is Calculated

The number is only as credible as the method behind it.

This estimate is deliberately conservative. It models the recoverable portion of reliability cost — the share an operation can realistically address through reliability governance — not the full theoretical cost of unreliability. Every assumption is stated below so the figure can be examined, challenged, and validated against your own data.

View methodology, formulas and assumptions +

Component 1 — Production-loss exposure

Unplanned downtime / asset = Operating hours × (1 − Availability) × 0.65
Exposure = Assets × Downtime/asset × Value per hour × Recovery factor (0.15–0.35)

Component 2 — Reactive maintenance premium

= Annual maintenance spend × (0.08–0.15)
The recoverable excess carried when work is reactive rather than planned.

Component 3 — Capital / inventory inefficiency

= Annual maintenance spend × (0.02–0.05)
Excess spares holding and premature capital replacement.

Assumptions applied

ParameterDefensible rangeApplied
Unplanned share of unavailability0.50 – 0.700.65
Recovery factor (production loss)0.15 – 0.35low → high
Reactive maintenance premium0.08 – 0.15low → high
Capital / inventory inefficiency0.02 – 0.05low → high

The low end of the range applies the most conservative recovery factors; the high end applies the upper bounds. The range itself is the honesty of the estimate.

On total Cost of Unreliability (CORU): the full CORU of an operation is materially larger than the figure shown here. This instrument deliberately reports only the recoverable exposure — the addressable portion — to avoid overstatement. The complete CORU is established during a Fleet Stability Audit.

Methodology aligned with reliability data discipline, asset management governance, and RCM principles — including ISO 14224, ISO 55000, and SAE JA1011. These standards inform the modelling approach; they do not prescribe this specific formula. Figures are indicative and intended for executive discussion, not financial reporting.

An indicative figure tells you the exposure exists. A Fleet Stability Audit tells you exactly where it sits, what it costs, and how to recover it.

The 15-day diagnostic converts this estimate into a quantified, board-ready Executive Risk Report — validated against your CMMS and breakdown data.

Explore the Fleet Stability Audit →